Populism and the Politics of Redemption

Monica Alexandra Brito-Vieira; Filipe Carreira da Silva

doi:10.1177/0725513618813374

Populism and the Politics of Redemption

Monica Alexandra Brito-Vieira, Filipe Carreira da Silva

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article re-examines current definitions of populism, which portray it as either a powerful corrective to representative democracy or as a mortal danger to it. It does so by exploring a crucial but often ignored dimension of populism: redemptive politics. Populism is here understood to function according to the logic of resentment, which involves both socio-political indignation and envy or ressentiment. In either case, populism has a distinctive redemptive character. Populism is oriented towards the future, but does not ignore the past. Highly moralized images of the past are used by populist leaders to castigate the present and promise the eminent advent of a new future. The argument is illustrated with Caesar’s Column, a futuristic novel written by the Minnesota populist leader Ignatius Donnelly. The complex and ambivalent structure of the novel, which served as a textual source for the Populist Party manifesto in the 1890s, enables us to move beyond the positions dominating the current debate. Reading Caesar’s Column ultimately shows that populism can be both a corrective and a danger to democracy, but not for the reasons usually stated in the literature.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	10-30
Journal	Thesis Eleven
Volume	149
Issue number	1
Early online date	14 Dec 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513618813374
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 14 Dec 2018

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Access to Document

10.1177/0725513618813374

Populism_Thesis_Eleven
This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details
Accepted author manuscript, 61.7 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{3d7d0d7eed9740dc88baaee263d9636f,

title = "Populism and the Politics of Redemption",

abstract = "This article re-examines current definitions of populism, which portray it as either a powerful corrective to representative democracy or as a mortal danger to it. It does so by exploring a crucial but often ignored dimension of populism: redemptive politics. Populism is here understood to function according to the logic of resentment, which involves both socio-political indignation and envy or ressentiment. In either case, populism has a distinctive redemptive character. Populism is oriented towards the future, but does not ignore the past. Highly moralized images of the past are used by populist leaders to castigate the present and promise the eminent advent of a new future. The argument is illustrated with Caesar{\textquoteright}s Column, a futuristic novel written by the Minnesota populist leader Ignatius Donnelly. The complex and ambivalent structure of the novel, which served as a textual source for the Populist Party manifesto in the 1890s, enables us to move beyond the positions dominating the current debate. Reading Caesar{\textquoteright}s Column ultimately shows that populism can be both a corrective and a danger to democracy, but not for the reasons usually stated in the literature. ",

author = "Brito-Vieira, {Monica Alexandra} and {Carreira da Silva}, Filipe",

note = "This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details ",

year = "2018",

month = dec,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1177/0725513618813374",

language = "English",

volume = "149",

pages = "10--30",

journal = "Thesis Eleven",

issn = "0725-5136",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Populism and the Politics of Redemption

AU - Brito-Vieira, Monica Alexandra

AU - Carreira da Silva, Filipe

N1 - This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

PY - 2018/12/14

Y1 - 2018/12/14

N2 - This article re-examines current definitions of populism, which portray it as either a powerful corrective to representative democracy or as a mortal danger to it. It does so by exploring a crucial but often ignored dimension of populism: redemptive politics. Populism is here understood to function according to the logic of resentment, which involves both socio-political indignation and envy or ressentiment. In either case, populism has a distinctive redemptive character. Populism is oriented towards the future, but does not ignore the past. Highly moralized images of the past are used by populist leaders to castigate the present and promise the eminent advent of a new future. The argument is illustrated with Caesar’s Column, a futuristic novel written by the Minnesota populist leader Ignatius Donnelly. The complex and ambivalent structure of the novel, which served as a textual source for the Populist Party manifesto in the 1890s, enables us to move beyond the positions dominating the current debate. Reading Caesar’s Column ultimately shows that populism can be both a corrective and a danger to democracy, but not for the reasons usually stated in the literature.

AB - This article re-examines current definitions of populism, which portray it as either a powerful corrective to representative democracy or as a mortal danger to it. It does so by exploring a crucial but often ignored dimension of populism: redemptive politics. Populism is here understood to function according to the logic of resentment, which involves both socio-political indignation and envy or ressentiment. In either case, populism has a distinctive redemptive character. Populism is oriented towards the future, but does not ignore the past. Highly moralized images of the past are used by populist leaders to castigate the present and promise the eminent advent of a new future. The argument is illustrated with Caesar’s Column, a futuristic novel written by the Minnesota populist leader Ignatius Donnelly. The complex and ambivalent structure of the novel, which served as a textual source for the Populist Party manifesto in the 1890s, enables us to move beyond the positions dominating the current debate. Reading Caesar’s Column ultimately shows that populism can be both a corrective and a danger to democracy, but not for the reasons usually stated in the literature.

U2 - 10.1177/0725513618813374

DO - 10.1177/0725513618813374

M3 - Article

SN - 0725-5136

VL - 149

SP - 10

EP - 30

JO - Thesis Eleven

JF - Thesis Eleven

IS - 1

ER -