Potential for large losses of carbon from non-native conifer plantations on deep peat over decadal timescales

Thomas J. Sloan*, Joshua Ratcliffe, Russell Anderson, W. Roland Gehrels, Peter Gilbert, Dmitri Mauquoy, Anthony J. Newton, Richard J. Payne, Justyna Serafin, Roxane Andersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Peatland drainage is a large source of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. While conversion to agriculture is widely acknowledged to lead to “irrecoverable” carbon (C) losses, in contrast the C impacts of peatland forestry are poorly understood, especially in intensively managed plantations. Losses of C from peat oxidation are highly variable and can be compensated for by gains of C in trees, depending on the lifecycle of the timber and timescale considered. Here, we used ITRAX scanning to enable rapid detection of the Hekla 4 cryptotephra layer as a reliable chronological marker above which peat properties and C stocks could be compared between open and afforested blanket bog cores in the Flow Country of Northern Scotland. At one site, Bad a’ Cheò, we combine replicated core pair comparisons (n = 19) with timber extraction data to derive net ecosystem C balance over the lifetime of the plantation. Here the reduction in peat C carbon storage above Hekla 4 in afforested samples (67 t C ha−1) is only partially compensated by tree C sequestration (47 t C ha−1), leading to a net ecosystem C balance indicating a loss of 20 t C ha−1 over the 50 years since the plantation was established. At that site, ∼65 % of tree C rapidly returned to the atmosphere, as it was primarily used for heat and power generation. Across the wider Flow country region, a simplified paired sampling method was adopted at eight further sites, finding a either a loss or negligible change in peat C storage above Hekla 4 in afforested samples with a mean loss of 86 t C ha−1 and median loss of 50 t C ha−1. This study suggests that potentially substantial C losses have been an unintended consequence of non-native conifer afforestation over deep blanket bogs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number175964
Number of pages13
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume953
Early online date13 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Nov 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors

Keywords

  • Blanket bog
  • Bulk density
  • C stocks
  • Drainage
  • Forestry
  • Tephrochronology

Cite this