By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review

Research output: Contribution to journal › Literature review › peer-review

Standard

Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review. / Mitchell, Fiona; Lunt, Neil; Shaw, Ian.

In: Evidence and Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 7-31.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Literature review › peer-review

Harvard

Mitchell, F, Lunt, N & Shaw, I 2010, 'Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review', Evidence and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7-31. <http://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/practitioner-research-programme-ian-shaw?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+irisspodcast+%28Institute+for+Research+and+Innovation+in+Social+Services+Podcast%29>

APA

Mitchell, F., Lunt, N., & Shaw, I. (2010). Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review. Evidence and Policy, 6(1), 7-31. http://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/practitioner-research-programme-ian-shaw?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+irisspodcast+%28Institute+for+Research+and+Innovation+in+Social+Services+Podcast%29

Vancouver

Mitchell F, Lunt N, Shaw I. Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review. Evidence and Policy. 2010 Jan;6(1):7-31.

Author

Mitchell, Fiona ; Lunt, Neil ; Shaw, Ian. / Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review. In: Evidence and Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 7-31.

Bibtex - Download

@article{685053adc3b74078a993a8f3701e2c36,
title = "Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review",
abstract = "This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.",
keywords = "practitioner research, knowledge review, classifying research",
author = "Fiona Mitchell and Neil Lunt and Ian Shaw",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "7--31",
journal = "Evidence and Policy",
issn = "1744-2648",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioner Research in Social Work: a Knowledge Review

AU - Mitchell, Fiona

AU - Lunt, Neil

AU - Shaw, Ian

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.

AB - This article reports what may be the first systematic mapping and review of practitioner research studies in social work. We reflect on the difficulties of identifying such studies and outline the review and mapping processes adopted in the study. The paper categorises the kinds of research undertaken, drawing on a recently developed framework; it also reports and assesses the research against its contribution to knowledge, its methodological standards and its pursuit of due ethical research process. Finally, the paper explores what is known regarding the utility of the research, its contribution to capacity building and its value for people, and closes with a discussion of the issues raised by the review.

KW - practitioner research

KW - knowledge review

KW - classifying research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955132810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Literature review

VL - 6

SP - 7

EP - 31

JO - Evidence and Policy

JF - Evidence and Policy

SN - 1744-2648

IS - 1

ER -

York staff: edit these data