By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Producing the product: A case study of law and its absence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Law and Society
DateE-pub ahead of print - 3 Nov 2017
DatePublished (current) - 3 Nov 2017
Issue numberS1
Volume44
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)93-110
Early online date3/11/17
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

In this article, we seek to develop socio-legal studies through arupturing of the ideas behind the social and the legal, ideas that aremost often presumed to exist and are used to explain that which isalready there. The ubiquity of law and the omniscience of society havebecome givens. We use a product called shared ownership as a casestudy, arguing that the product was given life by a legal document (thelease) which itself represented the translation of a range of differentperspectives and audiences (albeit not the consumer), and which, itself,has been translated, most notably in a 2008 High Court decision. Thatdecision counterintuitively found that the lease had created an assuredshorthold tenancy (albeit a long one) but, despite its threat to theproduct, has been largely ignored. We discuss the processes of, andreasons for, the translation through which that ignorance has beeninduced.

Bibliographical note

© 2017 The Author. Journal of Law and Society © 2017 Cardiff University Law School. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Research outputs

Impacts

  • Provided advice to Accent Housing about shared ownership

    Impact: Public Policy

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations