By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security. / Dwyer, Peter James.

In: Journal of Social Security Law, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.10.2018, p. 142-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Dwyer, PJ 2018, 'Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security', Journal of Social Security Law, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 142-157.

APA

Dwyer, P. J. (2018). Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security. Journal of Social Security Law, 25(3), 142-157.

Vancouver

Dwyer PJ. Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security. Journal of Social Security Law. 2018 Oct 1;25(3):142-157.

Author

Dwyer, Peter James. / Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security. In: Journal of Social Security Law. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 142-157.

Bibtex - Download

@article{7950c244f0f5437097b57fe36410d2bb,
title = "Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security",
abstract = "Benefit sanctions are now a central component of the UK’s increasingly conditionalsocial security system. Over the last two decades their reach has been extended beyond Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) claimants to include the majority of lone parents, many disabled people and, since the introduction of Universal Credit ( UC) in 2013, low paid workers in receipt of in work wage supplements and housing benefits. Utilising original data generated in a large (n.481 wave a), repeat qualitative longitudinal panel study this paper explores the impact of benefit sanctions on the lives of those in receipt of highly conditional social security benefits. It is concluded that benefit sanctions routinely trigger a range of profoundly negative outcomes that do not enhance the likelihood of people moving into paid work.",
author = "Dwyer, {Peter James}",
note = "This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "142--157",
journal = "Journal of Social Security Law",
issn = "1354-7747",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Punitive and ineffective: benefit sanctions within social security

AU - Dwyer, Peter James

N1 - This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Benefit sanctions are now a central component of the UK’s increasingly conditionalsocial security system. Over the last two decades their reach has been extended beyond Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) claimants to include the majority of lone parents, many disabled people and, since the introduction of Universal Credit ( UC) in 2013, low paid workers in receipt of in work wage supplements and housing benefits. Utilising original data generated in a large (n.481 wave a), repeat qualitative longitudinal panel study this paper explores the impact of benefit sanctions on the lives of those in receipt of highly conditional social security benefits. It is concluded that benefit sanctions routinely trigger a range of profoundly negative outcomes that do not enhance the likelihood of people moving into paid work.

AB - Benefit sanctions are now a central component of the UK’s increasingly conditionalsocial security system. Over the last two decades their reach has been extended beyond Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) claimants to include the majority of lone parents, many disabled people and, since the introduction of Universal Credit ( UC) in 2013, low paid workers in receipt of in work wage supplements and housing benefits. Utilising original data generated in a large (n.481 wave a), repeat qualitative longitudinal panel study this paper explores the impact of benefit sanctions on the lives of those in receipt of highly conditional social security benefits. It is concluded that benefit sanctions routinely trigger a range of profoundly negative outcomes that do not enhance the likelihood of people moving into paid work.

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 142

EP - 157

JO - Journal of Social Security Law

JF - Journal of Social Security Law

SN - 1354-7747

IS - 3

ER -