By the same authors

Quantitative scores for binary qualitative proficiency testing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)



Publication details

JournalAccreditation and Quality Assurance
DateAccepted/In press - 8 Apr 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 23 Apr 2019
DatePublished (current) - Aug 2019
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)263-269
Early online date23/04/19
Original languageEnglish


While z-scores provide participants with easy-to-interpret scores for quantitative proficiency tests, there is no universally accepted equivalent scoring method available for qualitative testing. Under the assumption that these tests follow a binomial distribution, it is possible to calculate scores that mimic the widely used z-scores and provide participants with insight into their performance level. We show that these scores, which we term a-scores, can be combined to provide a single score for multiple tests so that participants can monitor their performance over time, and discuss the use of the exact binomial test in place of uncertainty when there is no clear consensus.

Bibliographical note

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

    Research areas

  • Proficiency testing, Quantitative assessments, a-scores, z-scores

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations