Raising to object out of CP

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Raising to object out of CP. / Tanaka, H.

In: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 33, No. 4, 03.2006, p. 637-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Tanaka, H 2006, 'Raising to object out of CP', Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902762731790

APA

Tanaka, H. (2006). Raising to object out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(4), 637-652. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902762731790

Vancouver

Tanaka H. Raising to object out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry. 2006 Mar;33(4):637-652. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438902762731790

Author

Tanaka, H. / Raising to object out of CP. In: Linguistic Inquiry. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 637-652.

Bibtex - Download

@article{ed58fe2b4d1148b18e85c7e03ce5ee48,
title = "Raising to object out of CP",
abstract = "Kuno (1976) presents arguments for raising to object (RTO) in Japanese. After summarizing his analysis, this article presents additional data supporting RTO. Alternative analyses are also critically examined. The significance of RTO constructions in Japanese is that the RTO complement clause has a complementizer. It is suggested that this is permissible under the theory outlined in Chomsky 2000 if the RTO complement CP may have one A(-adjoined)-position in its edge.",
author = "H. Tanaka",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1162/002438902762731790",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "637--652",
journal = "Linguistic Inquiry",
issn = "0024-3892",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "4",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Raising to object out of CP

AU - Tanaka, H.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Kuno (1976) presents arguments for raising to object (RTO) in Japanese. After summarizing his analysis, this article presents additional data supporting RTO. Alternative analyses are also critically examined. The significance of RTO constructions in Japanese is that the RTO complement clause has a complementizer. It is suggested that this is permissible under the theory outlined in Chomsky 2000 if the RTO complement CP may have one A(-adjoined)-position in its edge.

AB - Kuno (1976) presents arguments for raising to object (RTO) in Japanese. After summarizing his analysis, this article presents additional data supporting RTO. Alternative analyses are also critically examined. The significance of RTO constructions in Japanese is that the RTO complement clause has a complementizer. It is suggested that this is permissible under the theory outlined in Chomsky 2000 if the RTO complement CP may have one A(-adjoined)-position in its edge.

U2 - 10.1162/002438902762731790

DO - 10.1162/002438902762731790

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 637

EP - 652

JO - Linguistic Inquiry

JF - Linguistic Inquiry

SN - 0024-3892

IS - 4

ER -