This chapter overviews those elements of an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis project that differ from a conventional meta-analysis of aggregate data. It describes the advantages and challenges of the IPD approach. IPD meta-analysis projects follow many of the same principles and research processes as conventional systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregate data. As most IPD projects rely on collaboration with the teams responsible for the included trials, negotiating and maintaining relationships with investigators from different countries, settings and disciplines can take considerable time, effort, diplomacy and careful management. There are many empirical comparisons of results produced by IPD meta-analyses with those based on corresponding analyses of published aggregate data. The chapter provides guidance to help researchers decide when the use of IPD is likely to provide more robust conclusions than using available aggregate data alone. A major motivation for meta-analysis is to increase statistical power over a single trial.
|Title of host publication
|Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|Subtitle of host publication
|a Handbook for Healthcare Research
|Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
|Number of pages
|Published - 22 Apr 2021
Bibliographical notePublisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.