Registering the Review

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Standard

Registering the Review. / Booth, Alison Margaret; Jones-Diette, Julie Susan.

Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Springer, 2018. p. 59-75.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Harvard

Booth, AM & Jones-Diette, JS 2018, Registering the Review. in Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Springer, pp. 59-75.

APA

Booth, A. M., & Jones-Diette, J. S. (2018). Registering the Review. In Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (pp. 59-75). Springer.

Vancouver

Booth AM, Jones-Diette JS. Registering the Review. In Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Springer. 2018. p. 59-75

Author

Booth, Alison Margaret ; Jones-Diette, Julie Susan. / Registering the Review. Diagnostic Meta-Analysis. Springer, 2018. pp. 59-75

Bibtex - Download

@inbook{9708bdd9c35c4b22a10f1ea1e845e60d,
title = "Registering the Review",
abstract = "High-quality systematic reviews start with good design and careful planning. It is not possible to eliminate bias, but by prespecifying methods in a protocol, the risk of bias can be minimised. A publicly available protocol also provides transparency in the process. Systematic reviewing is an iterative process, so subsequent deviations and changes from what was planned may be inevitable but should be recorded and justified at the stage of review when they occur. Such transparency in conduct and reporting enables those using systematic review findings to judge the quality of a review and assess for themselves the potential impact of any changes from the initial protocol. In this chapter we discuss the value of systematic review protocol registration and focus on PROSPERO, an open register designed specifically for prospective registration of systematic reviews. Examples from PROSPERO are used to illustrate considerations specific to systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.",
author = "Booth, {Alison Margaret} and Jones-Diette, {Julie Susan}",
year = "2018",
month = may,
day = "4",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-78965-1",
pages = "59--75",
booktitle = "Diagnostic Meta-Analysis",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - Registering the Review

AU - Booth, Alison Margaret

AU - Jones-Diette, Julie Susan

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - High-quality systematic reviews start with good design and careful planning. It is not possible to eliminate bias, but by prespecifying methods in a protocol, the risk of bias can be minimised. A publicly available protocol also provides transparency in the process. Systematic reviewing is an iterative process, so subsequent deviations and changes from what was planned may be inevitable but should be recorded and justified at the stage of review when they occur. Such transparency in conduct and reporting enables those using systematic review findings to judge the quality of a review and assess for themselves the potential impact of any changes from the initial protocol. In this chapter we discuss the value of systematic review protocol registration and focus on PROSPERO, an open register designed specifically for prospective registration of systematic reviews. Examples from PROSPERO are used to illustrate considerations specific to systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

AB - High-quality systematic reviews start with good design and careful planning. It is not possible to eliminate bias, but by prespecifying methods in a protocol, the risk of bias can be minimised. A publicly available protocol also provides transparency in the process. Systematic reviewing is an iterative process, so subsequent deviations and changes from what was planned may be inevitable but should be recorded and justified at the stage of review when they occur. Such transparency in conduct and reporting enables those using systematic review findings to judge the quality of a review and assess for themselves the potential impact of any changes from the initial protocol. In this chapter we discuss the value of systematic review protocol registration and focus on PROSPERO, an open register designed specifically for prospective registration of systematic reviews. Examples from PROSPERO are used to illustrate considerations specific to systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-78965-1

SP - 59

EP - 75

BT - Diagnostic Meta-Analysis

PB - Springer

ER -