Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation: A Response to Pogrow

Robert Slavin

Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation: A Response to Pogrow

Institute for Effective Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Comments on S. Pogrow's suggestion that educational programs should be judged by the degree to which schools using them achieve "surprising scores." Emphasizes the importance of the use of control groups in program evaluation. (SLD).

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	36-38
Number of pages	3
Journal	Educational Researcher
Volume	28
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 1999

Bibliographical note

Database: ERIC

Additional notes: Responds to S. Pogrow's comments on Slavin's article "Design Competitions: A Proposal for A New Federal Role in Educational Research and Development, ""Educational Researcher" v26 n1 p22-28 1997

Record type: New.

Language: English

DataStar source field: Educational Researcher, Apr 1999, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 36-38, ISSN: 0013-189X.

DataStar update date: 19990101

Access to Document

http://elinks.dialog.com/servlet/LinkManager.StarLinksDirector?issn=0013-189X&vol=28&issue=3&page=36&epage=38&year=1999&lm=false&rel=v3&userid=AAAWDK&publ=openURL8303011&aulast=Slavin&pf_id=0&app=EDUCAT&snr=20110607_162350_342f8_d&db=ERIC&title=Educational+Researcher&atitle=Rejoinder%3A+Yes%2C+Control+Groups+Are+Essential+in+Program+Evaluation%3A+A+Response+to+Pogrow. (Full text available at SFX)

Cite this

Slavin, R. (1999). Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation: A Response to Pogrow. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 36-38. http://elinks.dialog.com/servlet/LinkManager.StarLinksDirector?issn=0013-189X&vol=28&issue=3&page=36&epage=38&year=1999&lm=false&rel=v3&userid=AAAWDK&publ=openURL8303011&aulast=Slavin&pf_id=0&app=EDUCAT&snr=20110607_162350_342f8_d&db=ERIC&title=Educational+Researcher&atitle=Rejoinder%3A+Yes%2C+Control+Groups+Are+Essential+in+Program+Evaluation%3A+A+Response+to+Pogrow. (Full text available at SFX)

@article{fb7c97d909674dca950bca3487819ce5,

title = "Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation: A Response to Pogrow",

abstract = "Comments on S. Pogrow's suggestion that educational programs should be judged by the degree to which schools using them achieve {"}surprising scores.{"} Emphasizes the importance of the use of control groups in program evaluation. (SLD).",

author = "Robert Slavin",

note = "Database: ERIC Additional notes: Responds to S. Pogrow's comments on Slavin's article {"}Design Competitions: A Proposal for A New Federal Role in Educational Research and Development, {"}{"}Educational Researcher{"} v26 n1 p22-28 1997 Record type: New. Language: English DataStar source field: Educational Researcher, Apr 1999, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 36-38, ISSN: 0013-189X. DataStar update date: 19990101",

year = "1999",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "28",

pages = "36--38",

journal = "Educational Researcher",

issn = "0013-189X",

publisher = "SAGE",

number = "3",

}

Slavin, R 1999, 'Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation: A Response to Pogrow', Educational Researcher, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 36-38. <http://elinks.dialog.com/servlet/LinkManager.StarLinksDirector?issn=0013-189X&vol=28&issue=3&page=36&epage=38&year=1999&lm=false&rel=v3&userid=AAAWDK&publ=openURL8303011&aulast=Slavin&pf_id=0&app=EDUCAT&snr=20110607_162350_342f8_d&db=ERIC&title=Educational+Researcher&atitle=Rejoinder%3A+Yes%2C+Control+Groups+Are+Essential+in+Program+Evaluation%3A+A+Response+to+Pogrow. (Full text available at SFX)>

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder: Yes, Control Groups Are Essential in Program Evaluation

T2 - A Response to Pogrow

AU - Slavin, Robert

N1 - Database: ERIC Additional notes: Responds to S. Pogrow's comments on Slavin's article "Design Competitions: A Proposal for A New Federal Role in Educational Research and Development, ""Educational Researcher" v26 n1 p22-28 1997 Record type: New. Language: English DataStar source field: Educational Researcher, Apr 1999, vol. 28, no. 3, p. 36-38, ISSN: 0013-189X. DataStar update date: 19990101

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Comments on S. Pogrow's suggestion that educational programs should be judged by the degree to which schools using them achieve "surprising scores." Emphasizes the importance of the use of control groups in program evaluation. (SLD).

AB - Comments on S. Pogrow's suggestion that educational programs should be judged by the degree to which schools using them achieve "surprising scores." Emphasizes the importance of the use of control groups in program evaluation. (SLD).

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0013-189X

VL - 28

SP - 36

EP - 38

JO - Educational Researcher

JF - Educational Researcher

IS - 3

ER -