Relativity and quantum theory: under the spell of today's paradigms

Stefan Weigert

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071

Relativity and quantum theory: under the spell of today's paradigms

Stefan Weigert

Mathematics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

Thomas S. Kuhn described the development of the (natural) sciences as a specific dynamical process. Periods of piecemeal growth of knowledge based on widely accepted paradigms are interrupted by bursts of revolutionary changes which lead to new paradigms incommensurate with the earlier ones. This process is briefly illustrated by recalling the changes to classical physics brought about by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity on the one hand and by quantum theory on the other. Both theories represent fundamental paradigms of contemporary physics. They appear unshakeable to the working physicist but according to Kuhn their paradigmatic status is of a temporary nature only. Does Kuhn's framework help to identify potential future revolutions?

Original language	English
Article number	012071
Number of pages	10
Journal	Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume	2877
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071
Publication status	Published - 12 Nov 2024

Access to Document

10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071Licence: CC BY

Weigert_2024_J._Phys.__Conf._Ser._2877_012071Final published version, 1.08 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{d027dae771964b2ea3d699c9f773970f,

title = "Relativity and quantum theory: under the spell of today's paradigms",

abstract = "Thomas S. Kuhn described the development of the (natural) sciences as a specific dynamical process. Periods of piecemeal growth of knowledge based on widely accepted paradigms are interrupted by bursts of revolutionary changes which lead to new paradigms incommensurate with the earlier ones. This process is briefly illustrated by recalling the changes to classical physics brought about by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity on the one hand and by quantum theory on the other. Both theories represent fundamental paradigms of contemporary physics. They appear unshakeable to the working physicist but according to Kuhn their paradigmatic status is of a temporary nature only. Does Kuhn's framework help to identify potential future revolutions?",

author = "Stefan Weigert",

year = "2024",

month = nov,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071",

language = "English",

volume = "2877",

journal = "Journal of Physics: Conference Series",

issn = "1742-6588",

publisher = "IOP Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relativity and quantum theory

T2 - under the spell of today's paradigms

AU - Weigert, Stefan

PY - 2024/11/12

Y1 - 2024/11/12

N2 - Thomas S. Kuhn described the development of the (natural) sciences as a specific dynamical process. Periods of piecemeal growth of knowledge based on widely accepted paradigms are interrupted by bursts of revolutionary changes which lead to new paradigms incommensurate with the earlier ones. This process is briefly illustrated by recalling the changes to classical physics brought about by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity on the one hand and by quantum theory on the other. Both theories represent fundamental paradigms of contemporary physics. They appear unshakeable to the working physicist but according to Kuhn their paradigmatic status is of a temporary nature only. Does Kuhn's framework help to identify potential future revolutions?

AB - Thomas S. Kuhn described the development of the (natural) sciences as a specific dynamical process. Periods of piecemeal growth of knowledge based on widely accepted paradigms are interrupted by bursts of revolutionary changes which lead to new paradigms incommensurate with the earlier ones. This process is briefly illustrated by recalling the changes to classical physics brought about by Albert Einstein's theory of relativity on the one hand and by quantum theory on the other. Both theories represent fundamental paradigms of contemporary physics. They appear unshakeable to the working physicist but according to Kuhn their paradigmatic status is of a temporary nature only. Does Kuhn's framework help to identify potential future revolutions?

U2 - 10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071

DO - 10.1088/1742-6596/2877/1/012071

M3 - Conference article

SN - 1742-6588

VL - 2877

JO - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

JF - Journal of Physics: Conference Series

M1 - 012071

ER -