By the same authors

From the same journal

Removing the 'gag': Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Standard

Removing the 'gag' : Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants . / Brooks, Jennifer; Savitch, Nada; Gridley, Kate.

In: Social Research Practice, Vol. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 3-14.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Harvard

Brooks, J, Savitch, N & Gridley, K 2017, 'Removing the 'gag': Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants ', Social Research Practice, vol. 3, pp. 3-14. <http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/social-research-practice-journal-issue-03-winter-2017.pdf>

APA

Brooks, J., Savitch, N., & Gridley, K. (2017). Removing the 'gag': Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants . Social Research Practice, 3, 3-14. http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/social-research-practice-journal-issue-03-winter-2017.pdf

Vancouver

Brooks J, Savitch N, Gridley K. Removing the 'gag': Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants . Social Research Practice. 2017 Jan 1;3:3-14.

Author

Brooks, Jennifer ; Savitch, Nada ; Gridley, Kate. / Removing the 'gag' : Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants . In: Social Research Practice. 2017 ; Vol. 3. pp. 3-14.

Bibtex - Download

@article{b31a49e492b143d8903a944f81b70dfe,
title = "Removing the 'gag': Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants ",
abstract = "People with dementia are often excluded from taking part in research because of perceived difficulties in consent, capacity and communication. We argue that involving people with dementia in research is important, and describe how we involved people with dementia as both advisers and participants in research about the use of life story work. Researchers worked in partnership with Innovations in Dementia, who supported a network of advisers with dementia. Focus groups were arranged to ensure meaningful contributions by people with dementia. It was difficult to use standardised quality-of-life measures, and we describe the challenges faced with capacity and consent, recruitment and selection, and data collection. We suggest there is a need for (a) new tools for measuring quality of life of people with dementia which do not require participants to respond in prescribed ways, and (b) ethics and consent processes which are appropriate for non-medical research and which facilitate the involvement of people with dementia.",
keywords = "Dementia, Research, INVOLVEMENT",
author = "Jennifer Brooks and Nada Savitch and Kate Gridley",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2017, The Author(s) .This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.",
year = "2017",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "3--14",
journal = "Social Research Practice",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Removing the 'gag'

T2 - Involving people with dementia in research as advisers and participants

AU - Brooks, Jennifer

AU - Savitch, Nada

AU - Gridley, Kate

N1 - © 2017, The Author(s) .This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - People with dementia are often excluded from taking part in research because of perceived difficulties in consent, capacity and communication. We argue that involving people with dementia in research is important, and describe how we involved people with dementia as both advisers and participants in research about the use of life story work. Researchers worked in partnership with Innovations in Dementia, who supported a network of advisers with dementia. Focus groups were arranged to ensure meaningful contributions by people with dementia. It was difficult to use standardised quality-of-life measures, and we describe the challenges faced with capacity and consent, recruitment and selection, and data collection. We suggest there is a need for (a) new tools for measuring quality of life of people with dementia which do not require participants to respond in prescribed ways, and (b) ethics and consent processes which are appropriate for non-medical research and which facilitate the involvement of people with dementia.

AB - People with dementia are often excluded from taking part in research because of perceived difficulties in consent, capacity and communication. We argue that involving people with dementia in research is important, and describe how we involved people with dementia as both advisers and participants in research about the use of life story work. Researchers worked in partnership with Innovations in Dementia, who supported a network of advisers with dementia. Focus groups were arranged to ensure meaningful contributions by people with dementia. It was difficult to use standardised quality-of-life measures, and we describe the challenges faced with capacity and consent, recruitment and selection, and data collection. We suggest there is a need for (a) new tools for measuring quality of life of people with dementia which do not require participants to respond in prescribed ways, and (b) ethics and consent processes which are appropriate for non-medical research and which facilitate the involvement of people with dementia.

KW - Dementia

KW - Research

KW - INVOLVEMENT

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 3

EP - 14

JO - Social Research Practice

JF - Social Research Practice

ER -

York staff: edit these data