Renegotiation versus Brexit: The question of the UK’s constitutional relationship with the EU

TY - JOUR

T1 - Renegotiation versus Brexit

T2 - The question of the UK’s constitutional relationship with the EU

AU - Vasilopoulou, Sofia

AU - Keith, Daniel

N1 - © 2019 The Authors

PY - 2019/2/21

Y1 - 2019/2/21

N2 - This article examines how the public perceived Cameron’s renegotiation plan, and whether attitudes towards renegotiation followed a similar pattern to attitudes towards Brexit. It asks: are preferences towards renegotiation and Brexit related, and did British citizens perceive them as conflicting or complementary? We model similarities but also differences between these two types of preferences, which allows us to classify the attitudes into four patterns: Unconditional Europhiles, Rejectionist Eurosceptics, Risk-averse Eurosceptics and Power-seeking Eurosceptics. Using a large-N cross-sectional survey conducted in the UK in April 2015 (n=3.000), our findings suggest that similar utilitarian concerns underpinned both types of preferences; but education and partisan cues differentiated them. Our findings have implications for understanding the result of the UK referendum. They also highlight the complex considerations that drive citizens’ attitudes towards the EU and help us predict the scope of public acceptance of EU reform initiatives by other governments.

AB - This article examines how the public perceived Cameron’s renegotiation plan, and whether attitudes towards renegotiation followed a similar pattern to attitudes towards Brexit. It asks: are preferences towards renegotiation and Brexit related, and did British citizens perceive them as conflicting or complementary? We model similarities but also differences between these two types of preferences, which allows us to classify the attitudes into four patterns: Unconditional Europhiles, Rejectionist Eurosceptics, Risk-averse Eurosceptics and Power-seeking Eurosceptics. Using a large-N cross-sectional survey conducted in the UK in April 2015 (n=3.000), our findings suggest that similar utilitarian concerns underpinned both types of preferences; but education and partisan cues differentiated them. Our findings have implications for understanding the result of the UK referendum. They also highlight the complex considerations that drive citizens’ attitudes towards the EU and help us predict the scope of public acceptance of EU reform initiatives by other governments.

M3 - Article

SN - 0021-9886

VL - 57

JO - JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES

JF - JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES

IS - 3

ER -