Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002)

A W Ellis, J Monaghan

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

Abstract

E. Strain, K. E. Patterson, and M. S. Seidenberg (2002) reported an effect of image-ability and a Regularity X Imageability interaction in a regression analysis of naming latencies to 120 words. One of their items (couth) was named correctly by just 5 of their 24 participants, and its reaction time was an outlier on their distribution. When that single item is removed, the significant predictors are age of acquisition (AoA), word frequency, regularity, and length. Analyses of the combined data from J. Monaghan and A. W. Ellis's (2002) Experiments 1-3 indicate that AoA predicts naming latencies for exception words but not consistent words, E. Strain et al.'s other points are considered in the light of these observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)215-220
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2002

Keywords

  • WORD RECOGNITION
  • LEXICAL DECISION
  • ACQUISITION
  • AGE
  • FREQUENCY
  • IMAGEABILITY

Cite this