Abstract
Success for All, evaluated highly in several cities, has received unfair criticism. Opposing the process for developing, evaluating, and disseminating effective programs to high-poverty schools (particularly highlighting flaws in a tiny subset of studies) merely sows doubt and misinformation about a most promising reform development. (Contains 44 references.) (MLH).
Original language | Undefined/Unknown |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 38-40 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Phi Delta Kappan |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Bibliographical note
Database: ERICRecord type: New.
Language: English
DataStar source field: Phi Delta Kappan, Sep 2000, vol. 82, no. 1, p. 38-40,59-66, ISSN: 0031-7217.
DataStar update date: 20040101