Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst

Malin Ragnhild Holst

doi:10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825

Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst

Malin Ragnhild Holst

Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

In their paper, Redfern and Clegg draw attention to two key issues that have an adverse effect on English and Welsh osteological assemblages, including the commercial post-excavation analysis of human remains and academic research of human skeletons. This response to Redfern and Clegg’s paper is based on the experiences of these issues as a managing director of a commercial osteological company (York Osteoarchaeology Ltd) and as a lecturer in Bioarchaeology at the University of York and includes advice and suggestions from colleagues from both institutions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	588-593
Number of pages	6
Journal	World Archaeology
Volume	49
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825
Publication status	Published - 8 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Keywords

Skeleton excavation
biobanks
biomolecular analysis
community archaeology
reburial

Access to Document

10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825

Holst_final
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details
Accepted author manuscript, 29.1 KB

Cite this

@article{165ce934505e48789d3d2ef0035a7999,

title = "Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst",

abstract = "In their paper, Redfern and Clegg draw attention to two key issues that have an adverse effect on English and Welsh osteological assemblages, including the commercial post-excavation analysis of human remains and academic research of human skeletons. This response to Redfern and Clegg{\textquoteright}s paper is based on the experiences of these issues as a managing director of a commercial osteological company (York Osteoarchaeology Ltd) and as a lecturer in Bioarchaeology at the University of York and includes advice and suggestions from colleagues from both institutions.",

keywords = "Skeleton excavation, biobanks, biomolecular analysis, community archaeology, reburial",

author = "Holst, {Malin Ragnhild}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825",

language = "English",

volume = "49",

pages = "588--593",

journal = "World Archaeology ",

issn = "0043-8243",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst

AU - Holst, Malin Ragnhild

N1 - © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

PY - 2018/1/8

Y1 - 2018/1/8

N2 - In their paper, Redfern and Clegg draw attention to two key issues that have an adverse effect on English and Welsh osteological assemblages, including the commercial post-excavation analysis of human remains and academic research of human skeletons. This response to Redfern and Clegg’s paper is based on the experiences of these issues as a managing director of a commercial osteological company (York Osteoarchaeology Ltd) and as a lecturer in Bioarchaeology at the University of York and includes advice and suggestions from colleagues from both institutions.

AB - In their paper, Redfern and Clegg draw attention to two key issues that have an adverse effect on English and Welsh osteological assemblages, including the commercial post-excavation analysis of human remains and academic research of human skeletons. This response to Redfern and Clegg’s paper is based on the experiences of these issues as a managing director of a commercial osteological company (York Osteoarchaeology Ltd) and as a lecturer in Bioarchaeology at the University of York and includes advice and suggestions from colleagues from both institutions.

KW - Skeleton excavation

KW - biobanks

KW - biomolecular analysis

KW - community archaeology

KW - reburial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041098436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825

DO - 10.1080/00438243.2017.1411825

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 0043-8243

VL - 49

SP - 588

EP - 593

JO - World Archaeology

JF - World Archaeology

IS - 5

ER -

Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this