By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

From the same journal

Response to the paper by Redfern and Clegg by Malin Holst

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalWorld Archaeology
DatePublished - 8 Jan 2018
Issue number5
Volume49
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)588-593
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

In their paper, Redfern and Clegg draw attention to two key issues that have an adverse effect on English and Welsh osteological assemblages, including the commercial post-excavation analysis of human remains and academic research of human skeletons. This response to Redfern and Clegg’s paper is based on the experiences of these issues as a managing director of a commercial osteological company (York Osteoarchaeology Ltd) and as a lecturer in Bioarchaeology at the University of York and includes advice and suggestions from colleagues from both institutions.

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

    Research areas

  • Skeleton excavation, biobanks, biomolecular analysis, community archaeology, reburial

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations