Rigorous Large-Scale Educational RCTs are Often Uninformative: Should We Be Concerned?

Hugues Lortie-Forgues, Matthew Inglis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


There are a growing number of large-scale educational Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Considering their expense, it is important to reflect on the effectiveness of this approach. We assessed the magnitude and precision of effects found in those large-scale RCTs commissioned by the EEF (UK) and the NCEE (US) which evaluated interventions aimed at improving academic achievement in K-12 (141 RCTs; 1,222,024 students). The mean effect size was 0.06 standard deviations (SDs). These sat within relatively large confidence intervals (mean width 0.30 SDs) which meant that the results were often uninformative (the median Bayes factor was 0.56). We argue that our field needs, as a priority, to understand why educational RCTs often find small and uninformative effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-166
Number of pages9
JournalEducational Researcher
Issue number3
Early online date11 Mar 2019
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2019

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Cite this