By the same authors

From the same journal

Science, Policy, and Species at Risk in Canada

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published copy (DOI)


  • Arne O. Mooers
  • Dan F. Doak
  • C. Scott Findlay
  • David M. Green
  • Chris Grouios
  • Lisa L. Manne
  • Azadeh Rashvand
  • Murray A. Rudd
  • Jeannette Whitton


Publication details

DatePublished - Nov 2010
Issue number10
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)843-849
Original languageEnglish


The meaningful incorporation of independent scientific advice into effective public policy is a hurdle for any conservation legislation. Canada's Species at Risk Act (SARA; 2002) was designed to separate the science-based determination of a species' risk status from the decision to award it legal protection. However, thereafter, the input of independent science into policy has not been clearly identifiable. Audits of SARA have identified clear deficiencies in the protection and recovery of listed species; for example, of the 176 species legally protected in 2003, only one has a legal implementation plan for its recovery We argue that clearly distinguishing science from policy at all relevant stages would improve the scientific integrity, transparency, accountability, and public acceptance of the legal listing and recovery implementation processes in SARA. Such delineation would also clarify exactly what trade-offs are being made between at-risk species recovery and competing policy objectives.

    Research areas

  • endangered species, critical habitat, listing, recovery, transparency, ACT, FISHES

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations