By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

  • Ioannis Kontopoulos
  • Kirsty Penkman
  • Victoria E. Mullin
  • Laura Winkelbach
  • Martina Unterländer
  • Amelie Scheu
  • Susanne Kreutzer
  • Henrik B. Hansen
  • Ashot Margaryan
  • Matthew D. Teasdale
  • Birgit Gehlen
  • Martin Street
  • Niels Lynnerup
  • Ioannis Liritzis
  • Adamantios Sampson
  • Christina Papageorgopoulou
  • Morten E. Allentoft
  • Joachim Burger
  • Daniel G. Bradley
  • Matthew J. Collins

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalPLoS ONE
DateAccepted/In press - 12 Jun 2020
DatePublished (current) - 2020
Issue number6
Volume15
Pages (from-to)e0235146
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals' size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations