By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Searching for a threshold, not setting one: The role of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Health Services Research & Policy
DatePublished - Jan 2007
Issue number1
Volume12
Number of pages3
Pages (from-to)56-58
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

There has been much speculation about whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has, or ought to have, a'threshold' figure for the cost of an additional quality-adjusted life-year above which a technology will not be recommended for use. We argue that it is not constitutionally appropriate for NICE to set such a threshold, which is properly the business of parliament. Instead, the task for NICE is as a 'threshold-searcher' - to seek to identify an optimal threshold incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, at the ruling rate of expenditure, that is consistent with the aim of the health service to maximize population health. This will involve the identification of technologies currently made available by the National Health Service that have incremental cost-effectiveness ratios above the threshold, and alternative uses for those resources in the shape of technologies not currently provided that fall below the threshold

Bibliographical note

© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations