Selecting indicators for strategic performance management

TY - GEN

T1 - Selecting indicators for strategic performance management

AU - Marsden, Greg

AU - Kelly, Charlotte

AU - Snell, Carolyn

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - There is a growing emphasis on the use of indicators for performance measurement and management in the transport sector. In the United Kingdom all local authorities are now required to set out 5-year programs with commitments on progress over a range of mandatory and voluntary indicators linked to a series of key policy outcomes. Increasingly, the financial settlements that local authorities receive from the central government will be related to their performance against these targets. Different types of information are needed to fulfill different roles in the decision-making process. Research in the United Kingdom has indicated that there are too many indicators and yet too little clarity about what is being collected and reported on, at what level, and why. This paper reports on a study examining the use of indicators in 16 local and regional authorities in the United Kingdom. The results from a questionnaire and a series of follow-up interviews are combined with the findings of a desktop review of performance management in the public sector to propose a more logical and connected process for developing a suite of indicators that supports both strategy development and monitoring. The results suggest that the current indicator sets are not broad enough to ensure that the strategies proposed are consistent with sustainable transport goals. The lack of a comprehensive framework also increases the risk of negative impacts from monitoring programs, such as measure fixation and myopia. The more comprehensive approach proposed seeks to bring together the aspirations of strategy with the realities of measurement.

AB - There is a growing emphasis on the use of indicators for performance measurement and management in the transport sector. In the United Kingdom all local authorities are now required to set out 5-year programs with commitments on progress over a range of mandatory and voluntary indicators linked to a series of key policy outcomes. Increasingly, the financial settlements that local authorities receive from the central government will be related to their performance against these targets. Different types of information are needed to fulfill different roles in the decision-making process. Research in the United Kingdom has indicated that there are too many indicators and yet too little clarity about what is being collected and reported on, at what level, and why. This paper reports on a study examining the use of indicators in 16 local and regional authorities in the United Kingdom. The results from a questionnaire and a series of follow-up interviews are combined with the findings of a desktop review of performance management in the public sector to propose a more logical and connected process for developing a suite of indicators that supports both strategy development and monitoring. The results suggest that the current indicator sets are not broad enough to ensure that the strategies proposed are consistent with sustainable transport goals. The lack of a comprehensive framework also increases the risk of negative impacts from monitoring programs, such as measure fixation and myopia. The more comprehensive approach proposed seeks to bring together the aspirations of strategy with the realities of measurement.

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0-309-09965-X

SP - 21

EP - 29

BT - Management and Public Policy 2006

PB - TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NATL RESEARCH COUNCIL

CY - WASHINGTON

T2 - 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation-Research-Board

Y2 - 22 January 2006 through 26 January 2006

ER -