By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Self-Censorship for Democrats

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalEuropean Journal of Political Theory
DateE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jun 2015
DatePublished (current) - 1 Jul 2018
Issue number3
Volume17
Number of pages19
Pages (from-to)324-342
Early online date2/06/15
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

On the face of it, self-censorship is profoundly subversive of democracy, particularly in its talk-centric forms, and undermines the culture of openness and publicity on which it relies. This paper has two purposes. The first is to develop a conception of self-censorship that allows us to capture what is distinctive about the concept from a political perspective and which allows us to understand the democratic anxiety about self-censorship: if it is not obvious that biting our tongues is always wrong, we need a fuller account of the moral sensibility that finds it so troubling and this is elaborated here. The second is to develop an argument to the effect that this sensibility should not have the last, or only, word, but instead that self-censorship should be viewed as an ‘ordinary vice’ of democratic societies. The grounds for tolerating it rest on the democratic values that critics believe it threatens.

Bibliographical note

© 2015, The authors. This is an author produced version of a paper published in European Journal of Political Theory. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.

    Research areas

  • Self-censorship, democratic theory, free speech, power, realism

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations