Abstract
This paper considers whether we should believe philosophical claims on the basis of testimony in light of related debates about aesthetic and moral testimony. It is argued that we should not believe philosophical claims on testimony, and different explanations of why we should not are considered. It is suggested that the reason why we should not believe philosophical claims on testimony might be that philosophy is not truth-directed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 105-125 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society |
| Volume | 119 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2019 |
Bibliographical note
© 2019 The Aristotelian Society. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver