Situation Coverage Testing for a Simulated Autonomous Car -- an Initial Case Study

Research output: Working paper

Full text download(s)

Links

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

DatePublished - 15 Nov 2019
PublisherarXiv
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

It is hard to test autonomous robot (AR) software because of the range and diversity of external situations (terrain, obstacles, humans, peer robots) that AR must deal with. Common measures of testing adequacy may not address this diversity. Explicit situation coverage has been proposed as a solution, but there has been little empirical study of its effectiveness. In this paper, we describe an implementation of situation coverage for testing a simple simulated autonomous road vehicle, and evaluate its ability to find seeded faults compared to a random test generation approach. In our experiments, the performance of the two methods is similar, with situation coverage having a very slight advantage. We conclude that situation coverage probably does not have a significant benefit over random generation for the type of simple, research-grade AR software used here. It will likely be valuable when applied to more complex and mature software.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations