Spatial Intersectionality and Transformative Justice as Frameworks for Equitable Urban Planning in Divided and Post-Conflict Cities.

Susan Forde

doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796

Spatial Intersectionality and Transformative Justice as Frameworks for Equitable Urban Planning in Divided and Post-Conflict Cities.

Susan Forde

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In post-conflict and divided cities where urban spatial injustice is reinforced by enduring divisions, the frameworks of spatial intersectionality and transformative justice hold significant potential to address inequity through urban planning. All cities can be considered divided in some way and these divisions often represent spatial injustice or inequitable access to resources and space. However, in post-conflict and divided cities these divisions may be entrenched and may transgenerationally maintain conditions of inequity and violence. This paper presents spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for urban planning that have the potential to address inequity and divisions in all cities, but particularly in cities catergorised as divided due to violence or conflict. I propose a set of guiding questions for transformative justice informed urban planning.

Original language	English
Article number	104796
Number of pages	3
Journal	Cities
Volume	147
Early online date	22 Jan 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 22 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796Licence: CC BY

1-s2.0-S0264275124000106-main
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Final published version, 388 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{9307505a9cf8456f9bc5648f7a0b2d5a,

title = "Spatial Intersectionality and Transformative Justice as Frameworks for Equitable Urban Planning in Divided and Post-Conflict Cities.",

abstract = "In post-conflict and divided cities where urban spatial injustice is reinforced by enduring divisions, the frameworks of spatial intersectionality and transformative justice hold significant potential to address inequity through urban planning. All cities can be considered divided in some way and these divisions often represent spatial injustice or inequitable access to resources and space. However, in post-conflict and divided cities these divisions may be entrenched and may transgenerationally maintain conditions of inequity and violence. This paper presents spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for urban planning that have the potential to address inequity and divisions in all cities, but particularly in cities catergorised as divided due to violence or conflict. I propose a set of guiding questions for transformative justice informed urban planning.",

author = "Susan Forde",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.",

year = "2024",

month = jan,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796",

language = "English",

volume = "147",

journal = "Cities",

issn = "0264-2751",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial Intersectionality and Transformative Justice as Frameworks for Equitable Urban Planning in Divided and Post-Conflict Cities.

AU - Forde, Susan

PY - 2024/1/22

Y1 - 2024/1/22

N2 - In post-conflict and divided cities where urban spatial injustice is reinforced by enduring divisions, the frameworks of spatial intersectionality and transformative justice hold significant potential to address inequity through urban planning. All cities can be considered divided in some way and these divisions often represent spatial injustice or inequitable access to resources and space. However, in post-conflict and divided cities these divisions may be entrenched and may transgenerationally maintain conditions of inequity and violence. This paper presents spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for urban planning that have the potential to address inequity and divisions in all cities, but particularly in cities catergorised as divided due to violence or conflict. I propose a set of guiding questions for transformative justice informed urban planning.

AB - In post-conflict and divided cities where urban spatial injustice is reinforced by enduring divisions, the frameworks of spatial intersectionality and transformative justice hold significant potential to address inequity through urban planning. All cities can be considered divided in some way and these divisions often represent spatial injustice or inequitable access to resources and space. However, in post-conflict and divided cities these divisions may be entrenched and may transgenerationally maintain conditions of inequity and violence. This paper presents spatial intersectionality and transformative justice as frameworks for urban planning that have the potential to address inequity and divisions in all cities, but particularly in cities catergorised as divided due to violence or conflict. I propose a set of guiding questions for transformative justice informed urban planning.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796

DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104796

M3 - Article

SN - 0264-2751

VL - 147

JO - Cities

JF - Cities

M1 - 104796

ER -