Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they?

Catherine Arundel; Sophie James; Matthew Northgraves; Alison Booth

doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343

Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they?

Catherine Arundel^*, Sophie James, Matthew Northgraves, Alison Booth

^*Corresponding author for this work

Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.

Original language	English
Article number	100343
Pages (from-to)	100343
Number of pages	3
Journal	Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Volume	14
Early online date	11 Mar 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2019

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Reporting guidelines
Validation
Validity

Access to Document

10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343

1-s2.0-S2451865418302035-main
© 2019 The Authors.
Final published version, 192 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{c99573f84c1f45348a7da0c319947edc,

title = "Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they?",

abstract = "Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.",

keywords = "Reporting guidelines, Validation, Validity",

author = "Catherine Arundel and Sophie James and Matthew Northgraves and Alison Booth",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. ",

year = "2019",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "100343",

journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications",

issn = "2451-8654",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Study reporting guidelines

T2 - How valid are they?

AU - Arundel, Catherine

AU - James, Sophie

AU - Northgraves, Matthew

AU - Booth, Alison

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.

AB - Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines.

KW - Reporting guidelines

KW - Validation

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062807887&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343

DO - 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343

M3 - Article

C2 - 30923775

AN - SCOPUS:85062807887

SN - 2451-8654

VL - 14

SP - 100343

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications

M1 - 100343

ER -

Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they?

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this