Sungho Choi and the 'actual events' Clause

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Sungho Choi argued that the type of case I described to motivate my formulation of the 'actual events' clause of my theory of causation (Mind, 1999) failed to support the clause in question. He considered another type of case which might provide a justification and argues otherwise. I agree with him about the case I described but argue that he makes two unwarranted assumptions about the second case he considers. My formulation of the 'actual events' clause is justified by the fact that these assumptions need not be made for my theory to yield the correct verdicts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-47
Number of pages2
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2002

Cite this