Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development : a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS). / Boote, Jonathan D.; Twiddy, Maureen; Baird, Wendy; Birks, Yvonne Frances; Clare, Clarke; Beever, Daniel.
In: Health Expect., 2013.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development
T2 - a case study of a public involvement award scheme managed by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Design Service (RDS)
AU - Boote, Jonathan D.
AU - Twiddy, Maureen
AU - Baird, Wendy
AU - Birks, Yvonne Frances
AU - Clare, Clarke
AU - Beever, Daniel
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - BackgroundIt is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants.ObjectiveTo describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service (RDS). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented.DesignA case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England.ParticipantsUniversity and NHS-based researchers, and members of the public.FindingsBetween 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly £19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over £7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant development, which led to suggestions about how the scheme could be improved.ConclusionThis award scheme represents an efficient method of providing researchers with resources to involve the public in grant development and would appear to represent good value for money.
AB - BackgroundIt is good practice for the public to be involved in developing health research. Resources should be available for researchers to fund the involvement of the public in the development of their grants.ObjectiveTo describe a funding award scheme to support public involvement in grant development, managed by an NIHR Research Design Service (RDS). Case examples of how the award contributed to successful grant applications and findings from a recent evaluation of the scheme are presented.DesignA case study of resource provision to support public involvement activities in one region of England.ParticipantsUniversity and NHS-based researchers, and members of the public.FindingsBetween 2009 and 2012, the RDS approved 45 public involvement funding awards (totalling nearly £19 000). These awards contributed to 27 submitted applications at the time of writing, of which 11 were successful (totalling over £7.5 million). The evaluation revealed difficulties encountered by some researchers when involving the public in grant development, which led to suggestions about how the scheme could be improved.ConclusionThis award scheme represents an efficient method of providing researchers with resources to involve the public in grant development and would appear to represent good value for money.
KW - public involvement
KW - research design
KW - grant development
U2 - 10.1111/hex.12130
DO - 10.1111/hex.12130
M3 - Article
JO - Health Expect.
JF - Health Expect.
ER -