System justification in France: liberté, égalité, fraternité

Haley Elizabeth McAvay; Pavlos Vasilopoulos; John Jost; Melanie Langer

doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004

System justification in France: liberté, égalité, fraternité

Haley Elizabeth McAvay, Pavlos Vasilopoulos, John Jost, Melanie Langer

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Because of the legacy of the French Revolution and the post-World War II consensus on providing social welfare, France provides an intriguing context in which to investigate political ideology and system justification. We summarize the results of a large, nationally representative survey of French voters, which revealed that general system justification was associated—not with rightist ideology, as in other countries—but with leftist ideology. That is, self-identified leftists scored higher than rightists on general system justification, and system justification was positively associated with liberal and leftist preferences concerning immigration and welfare. After adjusting for political orientation, high system-justifiers in France also scored lower on authoritarianism, despite scoring higher on group-based dominance. These findings suggest that the Enlightenment ideals of “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité” are firmly established in France, and that liberal-leftist policies represent the status quo for most French citizens today.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	185-191
Number of pages	7
Journal	Current opinion in behavioral sciences
Volume	34
Early online date	16 Jun 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004
Publication status	Published - Aug 2020

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004

Langer-Vasilopoulos-McAvay-Jost-4-6-20
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.
Accepted author manuscript, 187 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{6a6c5e0daab24395afbd6160504a5c3c,

title = "System justification in France: libert{\'e}, {\'e}galit{\'e}, fraternit{\'e}",

abstract = "Because of the legacy of the French Revolution and the post-World War II consensus on providing social welfare, France provides an intriguing context in which to investigate political ideology and system justification. We summarize the results of a large, nationally representative survey of French voters, which revealed that general system justification was associated—not with rightist ideology, as in other countries—but with leftist ideology. That is, self-identified leftists scored higher than rightists on general system justification, and system justification was positively associated with liberal and leftist preferences concerning immigration and welfare. After adjusting for political orientation, high system-justifiers in France also scored lower on authoritarianism, despite scoring higher on group-based dominance. These findings suggest that the Enlightenment ideals of “Libert{\'e}, {\'E}galit{\'e}, Fraternit{\'e}” are firmly established in France, and that liberal-leftist policies represent the status quo for most French citizens today.",

author = "McAvay, {Haley Elizabeth} and Pavlos Vasilopoulos and John Jost and Melanie Langer",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy.",

year = "2020",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "185--191",

journal = "Current opinion in behavioral sciences",

issn = "2352-1546",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - System justification in France

T2 - liberté, égalité, fraternité

AU - McAvay, Haley Elizabeth

AU - Vasilopoulos, Pavlos

AU - Jost, John

AU - Langer, Melanie

PY - 2020/8

Y1 - 2020/8

N2 - Because of the legacy of the French Revolution and the post-World War II consensus on providing social welfare, France provides an intriguing context in which to investigate political ideology and system justification. We summarize the results of a large, nationally representative survey of French voters, which revealed that general system justification was associated—not with rightist ideology, as in other countries—but with leftist ideology. That is, self-identified leftists scored higher than rightists on general system justification, and system justification was positively associated with liberal and leftist preferences concerning immigration and welfare. After adjusting for political orientation, high system-justifiers in France also scored lower on authoritarianism, despite scoring higher on group-based dominance. These findings suggest that the Enlightenment ideals of “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité” are firmly established in France, and that liberal-leftist policies represent the status quo for most French citizens today.

AB - Because of the legacy of the French Revolution and the post-World War II consensus on providing social welfare, France provides an intriguing context in which to investigate political ideology and system justification. We summarize the results of a large, nationally representative survey of French voters, which revealed that general system justification was associated—not with rightist ideology, as in other countries—but with leftist ideology. That is, self-identified leftists scored higher than rightists on general system justification, and system justification was positively associated with liberal and leftist preferences concerning immigration and welfare. After adjusting for political orientation, high system-justifiers in France also scored lower on authoritarianism, despite scoring higher on group-based dominance. These findings suggest that the Enlightenment ideals of “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité” are firmly established in France, and that liberal-leftist policies represent the status quo for most French citizens today.

U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.04.004

M3 - Article

SN - 2352-1546

VL - 34

SP - 185

EP - 191

JO - Current opinion in behavioral sciences

JF - Current opinion in behavioral sciences

ER -