By the same authors

From the same journal

Taking the discussion onward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalInterdisciplinary science reviews
DateAccepted/In press - 10 Dec 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 25 Mar 2020
Issue number1
Volume45
Number of pages20
Pages (from-to)51-70
Early online date25/03/20
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This response to the foregoing reviews of The Poetry and Music of Science identifies common themes raised by them, responds to direct questions where this is possible and suggests further avenues of discussion. It focusses in particular on issues of the historical and cultural setting of human creativity, the particular issues raised by poetry, the differences between artistic and scientific imagination, the confusion (and de-confusion) of ‘imagination' and ‘creativity', the social and institutional framings of the sciences and the arts, the question of digital creativity and theological themes. A common emerging idea is that human creativity, whether artistic or scientific, is well-described by neither purely ‘expressive' nor ‘receptive’ actions but by a meeting of both.

Bibliographical note

© 2020 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Institute. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

    Research areas

  • arts and sciences, Creativity, imagination, Imago Dei, interdisciplinarity, scientific creativity, two cultures

Projects

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations