Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

David Moher; Paul Shekelle; Lesley A Stewart

doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9

Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

David Moher, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

Abstract

CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS: A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of the journal warmly thank the 219 reviewers whose comments helped to shape Systematic Reviews, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts for the journal in Volume 3 (2014).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	14
Journal	Systematic Reviews
Volume	4
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9
Publication status	Published - 2015

Bibliographical note

Produced as organisational piece in role as Co-Editor in Chief of Systematic Reviews journal. This will be a short annual publication that credits peer reviewers for input and provides a public record of that input. It is not a research publication

Access to Document

10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9

Cite this

@article{16188294e49f47ee93836994ea732026,

title = "Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014",

abstract = "CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS: A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of the journal warmly thank the 219 reviewers whose comments helped to shape Systematic Reviews, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts for the journal in Volume 3 (2014).",

author = "David Moher and Paul Shekelle and Stewart, {Lesley A}",

note = "Produced as organisational piece in role as Co-Editor in Chief of Systematic Reviews journal. This will be a short annual publication that credits peer reviewers for input and provides a public record of that input. It is not a research publication",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "14",

journal = "Systematic Reviews",

issn = "2046-4053",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thanks to all those who reviewed for Systematic Reviews in 2014

AU - Moher, David

AU - Shekelle, Paul

AU - Stewart, Lesley A

N1 - Produced as organisational piece in role as Co-Editor in Chief of Systematic Reviews journal. This will be a short annual publication that credits peer reviewers for input and provides a public record of that input. It is not a research publication

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS: A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of the journal warmly thank the 219 reviewers whose comments helped to shape Systematic Reviews, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts for the journal in Volume 3 (2014).

AB - CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS: A peer-reviewed journal would not survive without the generous time and insightful comments of the reviewers, whose efforts often go unrecognized. Although final decisions are always editorial, they are greatly facilitated by the deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, understanding of social consequences, and passion that reviewers bring to our deliberations. For these reasons, the Editors-in-Chief and staff of the journal warmly thank the 219 reviewers whose comments helped to shape Systematic Reviews, for their invaluable assistance with review of manuscripts for the journal in Volume 3 (2014).

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9

DO - 10.1186/s13643-015-0003-9

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 25874973

SN - 2046-4053

VL - 4

SP - 14

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

IS - 1

ER -