By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

The anatomical society core embryology syllabus for undergraduate medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Jane C Holland
  • Claire Smith
  • Marié O'Shea
  • Jane Stewart
  • Colin Ockleford
  • Gabrielle M Finn

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Anatomy
DateAccepted/In press - 1 May 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 20 Jun 2019
DatePublished (current) - Oct 2019
Issue number4
Volume235
Number of pages14
Pages (from-to)847-860
Early online date20/06/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

A modified Delphi methodology was used to develop a consensus regarding a series of learning outcome statements to act as the foundation of an undergraduate medical core embryology syllabus. A Delphi panel was formed by recruiting stakeholders with experience in leading undergraduate teaching of medical students. The panel (n = 18), including anatomists, embryologists and practising clinicians, were nominated by members of Council and/or the Education Committee of the Anatomical Society. Following development of an a priori set of learning outcome statements (n = 62) by the authors, panel members were asked in the first of a two-stage process to 'accept', 'reject' or 'modify' each learning outcome, to propose additional outcomes if desired. In the second stage, the panel was asked to either accept or reject 16 statements which had either been modified, or had failed to reach consensus, during the first Delphi round. Overall, 61 of 62 learning outcome statements, each linked to examples of clinical conditions to provide context, achieved an 80% level of agreement following the modified Delphi process and were therefore deemed accepted for inclusion within the syllabus. The proposed syllabus allows for flexibility within individual curricula, while still prioritising and focusing on the core level of knowledge of embryological processes by presenting the essential elements to all newly qualified doctors, regardless of their subsequent chosen specialty.

Bibliographical note

© 2019 Anatomical Society. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations