By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

The bedroom tax in the Supreme Court: implications of the judgment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalThe Journal of Poverty and Social Justice
DateAccepted/In press - 9 Mar 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Mar 2017
DatePublished (current) - Jun 2017
Issue number2
Volume25
Pages (from-to)181-187
Early online date27/03/17
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

In common with most decisions of the Supreme Court, the judgment in R. (on the application of Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 tells two stories: a short version and a long version. This article outlines both. The short story is the immediate impact of the decision: the application of the high-bar 'manifestly without reasonable foundation test', a distinction drawn on 'transparent medical need', and the lack of regard given to international obligations under the UNCRPD and the UNCRC. The long story is how this decision fits into the 'cut-and-devolve' approach to welfare reform in the UK, where local authorities are left to mitigate the effects of centrally determined benefit reductions without adequate support. After outlining the basis of the decision and its likely effects, this article argues that the decision does little to square this key structural circle at the heart of the UK government's welfare reform agenda.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations