By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

The case for family benefits

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

The case for family benefits. / Bradshaw, Jonathan Richard.

In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 34, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 590-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Bradshaw, JR 2012, 'The case for family benefits', Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009

APA

Bradshaw, J. R. (2012). The case for family benefits. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009

Vancouver

Bradshaw JR. The case for family benefits. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012 Mar;34(3):590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009

Author

Bradshaw, Jonathan Richard. / The case for family benefits. In: Children and Youth Services Review. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 590-596.

Bibtex - Download

@article{0ed395a2ad2e4543a4b063278a8e9e83,
title = "The case for family benefits",
abstract = "The package of support for families with children in the USA is not terribly effective. The model of targeted social assistance is also the one that has been advocated by the World Bank in middle and low income countries. It is failing poor children. This paper uses comparisons of child benefit packages in the European Union and Central and Eastern European and Confederation of Independent States (CEE/CIS) countries derived using model family methods. It rehearses the arguments in favour of universal family benefits — the norm in the EU. It calls for a new approach in the CEE/CIS and USA.",
author = "Bradshaw, {Jonathan Richard}",
year = "2012",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "590--596",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The case for family benefits

AU - Bradshaw, Jonathan Richard

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The package of support for families with children in the USA is not terribly effective. The model of targeted social assistance is also the one that has been advocated by the World Bank in middle and low income countries. It is failing poor children. This paper uses comparisons of child benefit packages in the European Union and Central and Eastern European and Confederation of Independent States (CEE/CIS) countries derived using model family methods. It rehearses the arguments in favour of universal family benefits — the norm in the EU. It calls for a new approach in the CEE/CIS and USA.

AB - The package of support for families with children in the USA is not terribly effective. The model of targeted social assistance is also the one that has been advocated by the World Bank in middle and low income countries. It is failing poor children. This paper uses comparisons of child benefit packages in the European Union and Central and Eastern European and Confederation of Independent States (CEE/CIS) countries derived using model family methods. It rehearses the arguments in favour of universal family benefits — the norm in the EU. It calls for a new approach in the CEE/CIS and USA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856638347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.10.009

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 590

EP - 596

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

IS - 3

ER -