By the same authors

From the same journal

The construction of opposition relations in high-, middle-, and low-rated postgraduate ESL Chinese students’ essays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of English for Academic Purposes
DateAccepted/In press - 19 Mar 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Mar 2018
DatePublished (current) - 1 Jul 2018
Volume34
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)68-85
Early online date27/03/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The construction of opposition relations is highly expected in writing at higher-university levels. Through specific discourse markers, writers signal these relations to demonstrate precision and awareness of complexity of others’ views and to evaluate those views critically. However, despite the high value of opposition relations in advanced academic writing, little is known about students’ construction of these relations. To contribute to this knowledge, this study built a corpus of argumentative essays written by native speakers of Chinese as part of their master's course assignments and compared the form and function of opposition relations in low-, middle-, and high-scored student writing. The quantitative analysis showed that the relationship between the frequency of opposition markers and writing score was not significant. However, considerable differences were found between the function and writing score when analysing the results qualitatively. High-scoring students used substantially more concessive and contrast expressions than middle- and low-scoring students. Suggestions for the teaching of opposition relations are discussed.

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.

    Research areas

  • Chinese postgraduate students, Disciplinary expectations, L2 writing, Opposition relations

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations