The Difference Principle Would Not Be Chosen behind the Veil of Ignorance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


John Rawls argues that the Difference Principle (also known as the Maximin Equity Criterion) would be chosen by parties trying to advance their individual interests behind the Veil of Ignorance. Behind this veil, the parties do not know who they are and they are unable to assign or estimate probabilities to their turning out to be any particular person in society. Much discussion of Rawls’s argument concerns whether he can plausibly rule out the parties’ having access to probabilities about who they are. Nevertheless, I argue that, even if the parties lacked access to probabilities about who they are in society, they would still reject the Difference Principle. I argue that there are cases where it is still clear to the parties that it is not in any of their individual interests that the Difference Principle is adopted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)588-604
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Philosophy
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

© 2018 The Journal of Philosophy, Inc.. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Cite this