The economic cost of treatment-resistant depression in patients referred to a specialist service

Paul McCrone, Felicitas Rost, Leonardo Koeser, Iakovina Koutoufa, Stephanie Stephanou, Martin Knapp, David Goldberg, David Taylor, Peter Fonagy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) suffer very significant morbidity and are at a disadvantage concerning optimal clinical management. There are high associated societal costs. Aims: A detailed analysis of health economic costs in the United Kingdom in a group manifesting a severe form of TRD in the 12 months before their participation in a major randomized controlled treatment trial. Methods: The sample consisted of 118 participants from the Tavistock Adult Depression Study. Recruitment was from primary care on the basis of current major depression disorder of at least 2 years’ duration and two failed treatment attempts. Service utilization was assessed based on self-report and general practitioner (GP) medical records. Generalized linear models were used to identify predictors of cost. Results: All participants used GP services. Use of other doctors and practice nurses was also high. The mean total societal cost was £22 124, 80% of which was due to lost work and care required of families. Level of general functioning was found to be the most consistent predictor of costs. Conclusions: Severe forms of TRD are associated with high costs in which unpaid care and lost work predominate. Treatments that improve functioning may reduce the large degree of burden.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-573
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Mental Health
Volume27
Issue number6
Early online date23 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • burden
  • cost economic analysis
  • Treatment-resistant depression

Cite this