The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations

Huiqin Yang; Carl Thompson; Robert M Hamm; Martin Bland; Alison Foster

doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-62

The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations

Huiqin Yang, Carl Thompson, Robert M Hamm, Martin Bland, Alison Foster

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The validity of studies describing clinicians' judgements based on their responses to paper cases is questionable, because - commonly used - paper case simulations only partly reflect real clinical environments. In this study we test whether paper case simulations evoke similar risk assessment judgements to the more realistic simulated patients used in high fidelity physical simulations.

Original language	English
Article number	62
Pages (from-to)	62
Journal	BMC medical informatics and decision making
Volume	13
Issue number	May
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-62
Publication status	Published - May 2013

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1186/1472-6947-13-62

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/13/62

Cite this

@article{f9aeeb1df78947fba4c1249f64fc6e2f,

title = "The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations",

abstract = "The validity of studies describing clinicians' judgements based on their responses to paper cases is questionable, because - commonly used - paper case simulations only partly reflect real clinical environments. In this study we test whether paper case simulations evoke similar risk assessment judgements to the more realistic simulated patients used in high fidelity physical simulations.",

author = "Huiqin Yang and Carl Thompson and Hamm, {Robert M} and Martin Bland and Alison Foster",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 Yang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. ",

year = "2013",

month = may,

doi = "10.1186/1472-6947-13-62",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "62",

journal = "BMC medical informatics and decision making",

issn = "1472-6947",

publisher = "BioMed Central",

number = "May",

}

The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements: a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations. / Yang, Huiqin ; Thompson, Carl; Hamm, Robert M et al.
In: BMC medical informatics and decision making, Vol. 13, No. May, 62, 05.2013, p. 62.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of improving task representativeness on capturing nurses' risk assessment judgements

T2 - a comparison of written case simulations and physical simulations

AU - Yang, Huiqin

AU - Thompson, Carl

AU - Hamm, Robert M

AU - Bland, Martin

AU - Foster, Alison

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - The validity of studies describing clinicians' judgements based on their responses to paper cases is questionable, because - commonly used - paper case simulations only partly reflect real clinical environments. In this study we test whether paper case simulations evoke similar risk assessment judgements to the more realistic simulated patients used in high fidelity physical simulations.

AB - The validity of studies describing clinicians' judgements based on their responses to paper cases is questionable, because - commonly used - paper case simulations only partly reflect real clinical environments. In this study we test whether paper case simulations evoke similar risk assessment judgements to the more realistic simulated patients used in high fidelity physical simulations.

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6947-13-62

DO - 10.1186/1472-6947-13-62

M3 - Article

C2 - 23718556

SN - 1472-6947

VL - 13

SP - 62

JO - BMC medical informatics and decision making

JF - BMC medical informatics and decision making

IS - May

M1 - 62

ER -