The hidden curriculum and its marginalisation of Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships

Megan E L Brown, Frederic W Hafferty, Gabrielle M Finn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) have a growing presence as a model of educational delivery on the stage of UK medical education, where they are most frequently based within primary care. Yet, despite both local and internationally reported benefits, significant challenges to programme implementation and student engagement remain. Although perhaps initially challenges could be explained by the novelty of LICs, UK LICs have aged, yet challenges remain, leading to the marginalisation of LICs within UK medical schools. This leading article suggests institutional hidden curricula may be an important vehicle for this marginalisation and explores how the dominant fact-based paradigm of UK medical education could act to dissuade student engagement with LICs. So long as the hidden curricula messages we transmit to early-stage medical students revolve around the disproportionate importance of cognitive knowledge acquisition, UK-based LICs are unlikely to realise their full impact or benefit, in comparison to successfully running LICs internationally. Alternatively, refocusing early medical education on patient interaction, encouraging students to take an active role in their care, would send a different hidden curricula message more aligned with the ethos of LICs, and so would likely increase uptake to later stage comprehensive programmes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-4
Number of pages4
JournalEducation for Primary Care
Early online date17 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Jun 2020

Cite this