By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding. / Dusheiko, M.; Gravelle, H.; Yu, N.; Campbell, S.

In: Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.07.2007, p. 742-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Dusheiko, M, Gravelle, H, Yu, N & Campbell, S 2007, 'The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding', Journal of Health Economics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 742-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003

APA

Dusheiko, M., Gravelle, H., Yu, N., & Campbell, S. (2007). The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding. Journal of Health Economics, 26(4), 742-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003

Vancouver

Dusheiko M, Gravelle H, Yu N, Campbell S. The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding. Journal of Health Economics. 2007 Jul 1;26(4):742-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003

Author

Dusheiko, M. ; Gravelle, H. ; Yu, N. ; Campbell, S. / The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding. In: Journal of Health Economics. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 742-762.

Bibtex - Download

@article{007bc4c150d445aca109bbc31532085e,
title = "The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding",
abstract = "Between 1991 and 1998 English general practices had the option of holding budgets for prescribing and elective secondary care. Fundholding was reintroduced in 2005. We examine the effect of fundholding on patients’ satisfaction with their practice, using a cross section of 4441 patients from 60 practices in the last year of fundholding (1998). We employ instrumental variables to allow for the endogeneity of fundholding. Patients of fundholders were less satisfied with the opening hours of their practice, their GP's knowledge of their medical history, with their GP's ability to arrange tests and willingness to refer to a specialist, and were more likely to agree that their doctor was more concerned about keeping costs down. Fundholder practices performed better on a number of process measures of care, and fundholding patients were more satisfied with additional non-medical services provided by the practice. The probability that patients were overall at least very satisfied with their GP practice was 0.073 (95{\%} CI, 0.009–0.138) smaller in fundholding practices.",
author = "M. Dusheiko and H. Gravelle and N. Yu and S. Campbell",
year = "2007",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "742--762",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of budgets for gatekeeping physicians on patient satisfaction: Evidence from fundholding

AU - Dusheiko, M.

AU - Gravelle, H.

AU - Yu, N.

AU - Campbell, S.

PY - 2007/7/1

Y1 - 2007/7/1

N2 - Between 1991 and 1998 English general practices had the option of holding budgets for prescribing and elective secondary care. Fundholding was reintroduced in 2005. We examine the effect of fundholding on patients’ satisfaction with their practice, using a cross section of 4441 patients from 60 practices in the last year of fundholding (1998). We employ instrumental variables to allow for the endogeneity of fundholding. Patients of fundholders were less satisfied with the opening hours of their practice, their GP's knowledge of their medical history, with their GP's ability to arrange tests and willingness to refer to a specialist, and were more likely to agree that their doctor was more concerned about keeping costs down. Fundholder practices performed better on a number of process measures of care, and fundholding patients were more satisfied with additional non-medical services provided by the practice. The probability that patients were overall at least very satisfied with their GP practice was 0.073 (95% CI, 0.009–0.138) smaller in fundholding practices.

AB - Between 1991 and 1998 English general practices had the option of holding budgets for prescribing and elective secondary care. Fundholding was reintroduced in 2005. We examine the effect of fundholding on patients’ satisfaction with their practice, using a cross section of 4441 patients from 60 practices in the last year of fundholding (1998). We employ instrumental variables to allow for the endogeneity of fundholding. Patients of fundholders were less satisfied with the opening hours of their practice, their GP's knowledge of their medical history, with their GP's ability to arrange tests and willingness to refer to a specialist, and were more likely to agree that their doctor was more concerned about keeping costs down. Fundholder practices performed better on a number of process measures of care, and fundholding patients were more satisfied with additional non-medical services provided by the practice. The probability that patients were overall at least very satisfied with their GP practice was 0.073 (95% CI, 0.009–0.138) smaller in fundholding practices.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.003

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 742

EP - 762

JO - Journal of Health Economics

T2 - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

IS - 4

ER -