The impact of criminalisation on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Fiona de Londras, Amanda Cleeve , Maria Isabel Rodriguez, Alana Farrell, Magdalena Furgalska, Antonella Lavelanet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Abortion is criminalised to at least some degree in most countries. International human rights bodies have recognised that criminalisation results in the provision of poor-quality healthcare goods and services, is associated with lack of registration and unavailability of essential medicines including mifepristone and misoprostol, obstructs the provision of abortion information, obstructs training for abortion provision, is associated with delayed and unsafe abortion, and does not achieve its apparent aims of ether protecting abortion seekers from unsafe abortion or preventing abortion. Human rights bodies recommend decriminalisation, which is generally associated with reduced stigma, improved quality of care, and improved access to safe abortion. Drawing on insights from reproductive health, law, policy, and human rights, this review addresses knowledge gaps related to the health and non-health outcomes of criminalisation of abortion. This review identified evidence of the impacts of criminalisation of people seeking to access abortion and on abortion providers and considered whether, and if so how, this demonstrates the incompatibility of criminalisation with substantive requirements of international human rights law. Our analysis shows that criminalisation is associated with negative implications for health outcomes, health systems, and human rights enjoyment. It provides a further underpinning from empirical evidence of the harms of criminalisation that have already been identified by human rights bodies. It also provides additional evidence to support the WHO’s recommendation for full decriminalisation of abortion.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere010409
Number of pages13
JournalBMJ Global health
Volume7
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Dec 2022

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022

Cite this