Abstract
In this response to Peter Auer's commentary, I revisit the question of phonetic form and interactional meaning as well as the question of what the aim of transcription actually is (or should be). What I advocate is a careful look at the ways in which our analyses link linguistic forms with actions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 23-27 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 31 Jan 2014 |