By the same authors

The myth of ‘older LGBT+’ people: research shortcomings and policy/practice implications for health/care provision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Aging Studies
DateAccepted/In press - 28 Aug 2020
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 11 Oct 2020
DatePublished - 1 Dec 2020
Volume55
Number of pages12
Early online date11/10/20
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This article explores the implications of research which takes a collectivised approach to lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans+ (LGBT+) ageing and which engages in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in doing so. Collectivised approaches to heterogenous identity-based groups address commonalities but often fail to address internal diversity, i.e. the differences between and among older LGBT+ people. This article explores six key problems associated with collectivised research: (1) Homogenising language and phrases; (2) Uneven numerical representation of sub-groups; (3) Thematic over-representation of sexuality; (4) Non-intersectional analyses; (5) Thematic under-representation of gender; and (6) Inaccurate reporting of data. Research which does not differentiate between ‘older LGBT+’ sub-populations, can provide policy-makers and practitioners with inaccurate and/or misleading information, resulting in services which meet the needs of some, but not all, older LGBT+ people. This article discusses how research can become more inclusive, intersectional and reliable.

Bibliographical note

© 2020 Elsevier Inc. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.

    Research areas

  • older, LGBT+, heterogeneity, Questionable Research Practices, healthcare, social care

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations