Abstract
This article explores the implications of research which takes a collectivised approach to lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans+ (LGBT+) ageing and which engages in Questionable Research Practices (QRPs) in doing so. Collectivised approaches to heterogenous identity-based groups address commonalities but often fail to address internal diversity, i.e. the differences between and among older LGBT+ people. This article explores six key problems associated with collectivised research: (1) Homogenising language and phrases; (2) Uneven numerical representation of sub-groups; (3) Thematic over-representation of sexuality; (4) Non-intersectional analyses; (5) Thematic under-representation of gender; and (6) Inaccurate reporting of data. Research which does not differentiate between 'older LGBT+' sub-populations, can provide policy-makers and practitioners with inaccurate and/or misleading information, resulting in services which meet the needs of some, but not all, older LGBT+ people. This article discusses how research can become more inclusive, intersectional and reliable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100880 |
| Pages (from-to) | 100880 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Aging Studies |
| Volume | 55 |
| Early online date | 11 Oct 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2020 |
Bibliographical note
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy.Keywords
- older
- LGBT+
- heterogeneity
- Questionable Research Practices
- healthcare
- social care