The OPAL bugs count survey: exploring the effects of urbanisation and habitat characteristics using citizen science

Adam J. Bates; Poppy Lakeman Fraser; Lucy Robinson; JohnC. Tweddle; JonP. Sadler; Sarah Elizabeth West; Simon Norman; Martin Batson; Linda Davies

doi:10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8

The OPAL bugs count survey: exploring the effects of urbanisation and habitat characteristics using citizen science

Adam J. Bates, Poppy Lakeman Fraser, Lucy Robinson, JohnC. Tweddle, JonP. Sadler, Sarah Elizabeth West, Simon Norman, Martin Batson, Linda Davies

Stockholm Environment Institute at York

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Citizen science projects can gather datasets with observation counts and spatiotemporal coverage far in excess of what can easily be achieved using only professional scientists. However, there exists a potential trade-off between the number of participants and the quality of data gathered. The Bugs Count citizen science project had thousands of participants because of its few barriers to taking part, allowing participation by anyone in England with access to any area of outdoor space. It was designed to scope for both the effects of variation in local habitat and urbanisation on broad taxonomic groups of invertebrates, and the responses of six target ‘Species Quest’ species (Adalia bipunctata, Ocypus olens, Aglais urticae, Palomena prasina, Limax maximus, and Bombus hypnorum) to urbanisation. Participants were asked to search for invertebrates in three areas: ‘soft ground surfaces’, ‘human-made hard surfaces’, and ‘plants’ for 15 min per search. Participants recorded counts of taxa found and a range of environmental information about the survey area. Data samples were weighted according to identification experience and participant age and analysed using canonical correspondence analysis, and tests of observation homogeneity. Species Quest species showed species-specific relationships with urbanisation, but broad taxonomic groups did not show significant relationships with urbanisation. The latter were instead influenced by habitat type and microhabitat availability. The approach used demonstrates that citizen science projects with few barriers to entry can gather viable datasets for scoping broad trends, providing that the projects are carefully designed and analysed to ensure data quality.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1477–1497
Journal	Urban Ecosystems
Volume	18
Issue number	4
Early online date	1 May 2015
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8
Publication status	Published - Dec 2015

Keywords

Data quality
Environmental education
Open air laboratories
Public participation in scientific research
Scientific literacy
Urban–rural gradient

Access to Document

10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8

Cite this

@article{2e802afc6f584593bdab1f8703abc29f,

title = "The OPAL bugs count survey: exploring the effects of urbanisation and habitat characteristics using citizen science",

abstract = "Citizen science projects can gather datasets with observation counts and spatiotemporal coverage far in excess of what can easily be achieved using only professional scientists. However, there exists a potential trade-off between the number of participants and the quality of data gathered. The Bugs Count citizen science project had thousands of participants because of its few barriers to taking part, allowing participation by anyone in England with access to any area of outdoor space. It was designed to scope for both the effects of variation in local habitat and urbanisation on broad taxonomic groups of invertebrates, and the responses of six target {\textquoteleft}Species Quest{\textquoteright} species (Adalia bipunctata, Ocypus olens, Aglais urticae, Palomena prasina, Limax maximus, and Bombus hypnorum) to urbanisation. Participants were asked to search for invertebrates in three areas: {\textquoteleft}soft ground surfaces{\textquoteright}, {\textquoteleft}human-made hard surfaces{\textquoteright}, and {\textquoteleft}plants{\textquoteright} for 15 min per search. Participants recorded counts of taxa found and a range of environmental information about the survey area. Data samples were weighted according to identification experience and participant age and analysed using canonical correspondence analysis, and tests of observation homogeneity. Species Quest species showed species-specific relationships with urbanisation, but broad taxonomic groups did not show significant relationships with urbanisation. The latter were instead influenced by habitat type and microhabitat availability. The approach used demonstrates that citizen science projects with few barriers to entry can gather viable datasets for scoping broad trends, providing that the projects are carefully designed and analysed to ensure data quality.",

keywords = "Data quality, Environmental education, Open air laboratories, Public participation in scientific research, Scientific literacy, Urban–rural gradient",

author = "Bates, {Adam J.} and {Lakeman Fraser}, Poppy and Lucy Robinson and JohnC. Tweddle and JonP. Sadler and West, {Sarah Elizabeth} and Simon Norman and Martin Batson and Linda Davies",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8",

language = "English",

volume = "18",

pages = "1477–1497",

journal = "Urban Ecosystems",

issn = "1083-8155",

publisher = "Kluwer",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The OPAL bugs count survey

T2 - exploring the effects of urbanisation and habitat characteristics using citizen science

AU - Bates, Adam J.

AU - Lakeman Fraser, Poppy

AU - Robinson, Lucy

AU - Tweddle, JohnC.

AU - Sadler, JonP.

AU - West, Sarah Elizabeth

AU - Norman, Simon

AU - Batson, Martin

AU - Davies, Linda

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Citizen science projects can gather datasets with observation counts and spatiotemporal coverage far in excess of what can easily be achieved using only professional scientists. However, there exists a potential trade-off between the number of participants and the quality of data gathered. The Bugs Count citizen science project had thousands of participants because of its few barriers to taking part, allowing participation by anyone in England with access to any area of outdoor space. It was designed to scope for both the effects of variation in local habitat and urbanisation on broad taxonomic groups of invertebrates, and the responses of six target ‘Species Quest’ species (Adalia bipunctata, Ocypus olens, Aglais urticae, Palomena prasina, Limax maximus, and Bombus hypnorum) to urbanisation. Participants were asked to search for invertebrates in three areas: ‘soft ground surfaces’, ‘human-made hard surfaces’, and ‘plants’ for 15 min per search. Participants recorded counts of taxa found and a range of environmental information about the survey area. Data samples were weighted according to identification experience and participant age and analysed using canonical correspondence analysis, and tests of observation homogeneity. Species Quest species showed species-specific relationships with urbanisation, but broad taxonomic groups did not show significant relationships with urbanisation. The latter were instead influenced by habitat type and microhabitat availability. The approach used demonstrates that citizen science projects with few barriers to entry can gather viable datasets for scoping broad trends, providing that the projects are carefully designed and analysed to ensure data quality.

AB - Citizen science projects can gather datasets with observation counts and spatiotemporal coverage far in excess of what can easily be achieved using only professional scientists. However, there exists a potential trade-off between the number of participants and the quality of data gathered. The Bugs Count citizen science project had thousands of participants because of its few barriers to taking part, allowing participation by anyone in England with access to any area of outdoor space. It was designed to scope for both the effects of variation in local habitat and urbanisation on broad taxonomic groups of invertebrates, and the responses of six target ‘Species Quest’ species (Adalia bipunctata, Ocypus olens, Aglais urticae, Palomena prasina, Limax maximus, and Bombus hypnorum) to urbanisation. Participants were asked to search for invertebrates in three areas: ‘soft ground surfaces’, ‘human-made hard surfaces’, and ‘plants’ for 15 min per search. Participants recorded counts of taxa found and a range of environmental information about the survey area. Data samples were weighted according to identification experience and participant age and analysed using canonical correspondence analysis, and tests of observation homogeneity. Species Quest species showed species-specific relationships with urbanisation, but broad taxonomic groups did not show significant relationships with urbanisation. The latter were instead influenced by habitat type and microhabitat availability. The approach used demonstrates that citizen science projects with few barriers to entry can gather viable datasets for scoping broad trends, providing that the projects are carefully designed and analysed to ensure data quality.

KW - Data quality

KW - Environmental education

KW - Open air laboratories

KW - Public participation in scientific research

KW - Scientific literacy

KW - Urban–rural gradient

U2 - 10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8

DO - 10.1007/s11252-015-0470-8

M3 - Article

SN - 1083-8155

VL - 18

SP - 1477

EP - 1497

JO - Urban Ecosystems

JF - Urban Ecosystems

IS - 4

ER -