By the same authors

From the same journal

The parity view and intuitions of neutrality

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalEconomics and Philosophy
DatePublished - Mar 2007
Issue number1
Volume23
Number of pages8
Pages (from-to)107-114
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

One response to Derek Parfit's 'mere addition paradox' invokes the relation of 'parity'. Since parity is a form of 'incommensurateness' in John Broome's terms, three doubts which Broome raises about accounts involving incommensurateness in Weighing Lives pose a challenge for this response. I discuss two of these. They emerge from a discussion of various intuitions about 'neutrality'. I argue that an account based on parity may be no less consistent with Broome's intuitions than is his own vagueness view.

    Research areas

  • UTILITARIANISM

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations