By the same authors

From the same journal

The parity view and intuitions of neutrality

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Standard

The parity view and intuitions of neutrality. / Qizilbash, Mozaffar.

In: Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 03.2007, p. 107-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Harvard

Qizilbash, M 2007, 'The parity view and intuitions of neutrality', Economics and Philosophy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001265

APA

Qizilbash, M. (2007). The parity view and intuitions of neutrality. Economics and Philosophy, 23(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001265

Vancouver

Qizilbash M. The parity view and intuitions of neutrality. Economics and Philosophy. 2007 Mar;23(1):107-114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267107001265

Author

Qizilbash, Mozaffar. / The parity view and intuitions of neutrality. In: Economics and Philosophy. 2007 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 107-114.

Bibtex - Download

@article{0f719b58283647b38a0fe5891781d0f2,
title = "The parity view and intuitions of neutrality",
abstract = "One response to Derek Parfit's 'mere addition paradox' invokes the relation of 'parity'. Since parity is a form of 'incommensurateness' in John Broome's terms, three doubts which Broome raises about accounts involving incommensurateness in Weighing Lives pose a challenge for this response. I discuss two of these. They emerge from a discussion of various intuitions about 'neutrality'. I argue that an account based on parity may be no less consistent with Broome's intuitions than is his own vagueness view.",
keywords = "UTILITARIANISM",
author = "Mozaffar Qizilbash",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S0266267107001265",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "107--114",
journal = "Economics and Philosophy",
issn = "0266-2671",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The parity view and intuitions of neutrality

AU - Qizilbash, Mozaffar

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - One response to Derek Parfit's 'mere addition paradox' invokes the relation of 'parity'. Since parity is a form of 'incommensurateness' in John Broome's terms, three doubts which Broome raises about accounts involving incommensurateness in Weighing Lives pose a challenge for this response. I discuss two of these. They emerge from a discussion of various intuitions about 'neutrality'. I argue that an account based on parity may be no less consistent with Broome's intuitions than is his own vagueness view.

AB - One response to Derek Parfit's 'mere addition paradox' invokes the relation of 'parity'. Since parity is a form of 'incommensurateness' in John Broome's terms, three doubts which Broome raises about accounts involving incommensurateness in Weighing Lives pose a challenge for this response. I discuss two of these. They emerge from a discussion of various intuitions about 'neutrality'. I argue that an account based on parity may be no less consistent with Broome's intuitions than is his own vagueness view.

KW - UTILITARIANISM

U2 - 10.1017/S0266267107001265

DO - 10.1017/S0266267107001265

M3 - Editorial

VL - 23

SP - 107

EP - 114

JO - Economics and Philosophy

T2 - Economics and Philosophy

JF - Economics and Philosophy

SN - 0266-2671

IS - 1

ER -