By the same authors

From the same journal

The Pyrrhic Victory of Game Studies: Assessing the Past, Present, and Future of Interdisciplinary Game Research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalGames and Culture
DateAccepted/In press - 27 Jul 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 1 Sep 2016
DatePublished (current) - 1 Sep 2017
Issue number6
Volume12
Pages (from-to)521-543
Early online date1/09/16
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Although game studies are widely viewed as an interdisciplinary field, it is unclear how interdisciplinary they actually are. In response, this article reads scientometric data and game studies editorials, handbooks and introductions through the lens of interdisciplinarity studies to assess game studies’ status as an interdiscipline. It argues that game studies show drivers and hurdles typical for interdisciplines. Yet instead of establishing themselves as the broad umbrella interdiscipline of digital game research, they are becoming one narrow cultural studies multidiscipline within the growing and diversifying field of game research and education. Researchers from fields like human-computer interaction or communication are abandoning game studies venues in favor of disciplinary ones – ironically thanks to game studies legitimizing game research. The article suggests that a design orientation and cross-disciplinary boundary objects such as middle range theories could help to broaden, deepen, and secure future interdisciplinary game research.

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

    Research areas

  • game studies, interdisciplinarity studies, Interdisciplinarity, games, game research, multidisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, design research

Projects

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations