By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

The Relationship between Autonomy and Adult Mental Capacity in the Law of England and Wales

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalMedical Law Review
DateAccepted/In press - 13 Mar 2018
DatePublished (current) - 18 Apr 2018
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Judges in England and Wales tell three apparently contradictory stories about the relationship between autonomy and mental capacity. Sometimes, capacity is autonomy’s gatekeeper: those with capacity are autonomous, but those without capacity are not. Sometimes, capacity is necessary for autonomy but insufficient; for voluntariness, freedom from undue external influences is also required. Finally, sometimes autonomy survives incapacity, and a person without capacity is nevertheless treated as autonomous. These three accounts coexist, so no story of evolution, in which one account comes to replace another, can be told. Similarly, no story of judicial factions is plausible, for judges switch account to suit the facts of a particular case. This article gives examples of all three accounts, traces their recent history, and shows how each serves one or two characteristic purposes. It then shows how they can be combined into a coherent descriptive account of the relationship between autonomy and mental capacity in domestic law.

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2018. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations